Luigi Mangione Claims Attorney General Pam Bondi Has Conflict of Interest in Seeking Death Penalty

The defense argues Bondi’s past lobbying connections create a conflict of interest that should remove capital punishment from the case.

Luigi Mangione with dark hair and a suit looks towards the camera in a crowded room.
(Photo by Curtis Means-Pool/Getty Images)

Luigi Mangione claims he now understands why Attorney General Pam Bondi personally authorized federal prosecutors to seek the death penalty against him, and his attorneys argue it has less to do with justice than with a serious conflict of interest.

In a court filing submitted Friday night, Mangione’s defense team accused Bondi of having undisclosed financial ties to the health care company run by the suspect's alleged murder victim, UnitedHealthCare CEO Brian Thompson. Mangione is charged federally with stalking and murder through the use of a firearm in connection with Thompson’s 2024 killing, in addition to facing separate state charges.

According to the filing, Bondi was previously a partner at the lobbying firm Ballard Partners before becoming attorney general. That firm has listed UnitedHealth Group, the parent company of UnitedHealthCare, since "at least" 2023. Mangione’s attorneys allege Bondi continues to receive financial benefits from Ballard through a profit-sharing plan tied to the firm’s professional associations, including its work for UnitedHealth.

The defense argues that Bondi’s financial relationship with the lobbying firm, and by extension a company linked to the victim, should have required her to recuse herself from any involvement in the case. Instead, they claim, Bondi’s first major act as attorney general was publicly directing prosecutors to pursue the death penalty against Mangione, a move they describe as unprecedented and constitutionally improper.

Mangione’s lawyers contend the alleged conflict violates his due process rights and taints the decision to seek capital punishment. They are asking the court to strike the notice of intent to seek the death penalty or dismiss the affected charges altogether.

The defense team, led by attorneys Karen Friedman-Agnifilo and Marc Agnifilo, further argues that Bondi’s public statements about Mangione’s guilt and the merits of execution prejudiced the case and interfered with the fair administration of justice, citing federal court rules governing prosecutorial conduct.

Mangione has pleaded not guilty. He was arrested in Pennsylvania following the shooting and is currently awaiting trial as judges weigh multiple motions in both the state and federal cases challenging evidence, charging statutes, and the death penalty itself. A ruling on whether prosecutors can continue seeking capital punishment is expected before the case moves forward.

Stay ahead on Exclusives

Download the Complex App